Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Vesiylioikeus 14.2.1989 24/1989 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal; self-signed letter suffices for procedural submission even if drafted by another.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 14.2.1989 24/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the appeal regarding the admissibility of a procedural submission. The appellant argued that a letter drafted by a third party lacked validity without their own signature, while the opposing party contended that the document was sufficient as long as it bore the appellant's handwritten signature. The court ruled that the requirement for a self-signed letter is met if the appellant personally signs the final document, regardless of who composed the text.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

HValL 9a § 2 mom; OK 15 luku 10 §: A procedural submission is admissible if it bears the appellant's own handwritten signature, even if the document was drafted by a third party.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal admissibility procedural submission requirements handwritten signature validity third party drafting self-signed document rule

Cited Legislation

AI generated
HValL 9a § 2 mom
OK 15 luku 10 §
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Valituskirjan tutkimiseksi hakemusasiassa riitti, että kirjelmässä

oli valittajan omakätinen allekirjoitus, vaikka kirjelmän

olisikin laatinut joku muu kuin valittaja.

HValL 9a § 2 mom

Vrt. OK 15 luku 10 §

Lainvoimainen