Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 13.9.1989 151/1989 AI generated

Administrative court quashed water authority's decision to grant rights to areas outside plan scope.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 13.9.1989 151/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Finland quashed the Water Authority's decision granting rights to areas not required for planned excavations or constructions. The authority had overstepped its jurisdiction by including such areas in its compensation and usage rights grant. Consequently, the case was remanded for reconsideration within the authority's proper powers.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 2 luku 7 §; VesiL 2 luku 8 §: The water authority lacks jurisdiction to grant compensation and usage rights to areas that fall outside the scope of necessary excavations, leveling, or dam construction defined in the relevant plan.

Keywords

AI generated
water authority jurisdiction compensation rights grant usage rights scope administrative plan scope remand for reconsideration

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 2 luku 7 §
VesiL 2 luku 8 §
RakennusL
AI generated
kko-other_2010_2458
Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal objection, ruling procedural silence does not equate to formal withdrawal.
admin_1988_water-superior__140
Administrative court dismissed water authority's permit due to missing mandatory groundwater impact studies.
kko-other_2004_1223
Supreme Court allows compensation for unauthorized ditching on expropriated land under specific property law provisions.
kho-precedent_2014_70
Supreme Administrative Court quashed orders for removing waste items under two different laws due to procedural flaws.
admin_2017_vaasa__182
Administrative court dismissed local authority's jurisdiction over water discharge permit, transferring case to regional authority.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

VEO oli myöntänyt kunnalle lunastus- ja käyttöoikeuden myös

sellaisiin puistoalueeksi tarvittaviin maa-alueisiin ja sellaisiin

vesialueisiin, jotka eivät olleet tarpeen suunnitelman

mukaisia ruoppauksia, läjityksiä, patoja ym. varten, joihin

VEO oli antanut luvan. Lunastettavan alueen omistajan muutoksenhakemuksesta

VYO lausui, että lunastus- ja käyttöoikeuden

myöntäminen mainittuihin alueisiin ei kuulunut VEO:n toimivaltaan.

VYO kumosi VEO:n päätöksen kokonaisuudessaan ja palautti

asian sinne uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.

VesiL 2 luku 7 §

VesiL 2 luku 8 §

RakennusL

L kiinteän omaisuuden ja erityisten oikeuksien lunastuksesta

Lainvoimainen