Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 17.8.1989 137/1989 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed water protection association's appeal as it lacked standing in sewage discharge permit case.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 17.8.1989 137/1989
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the water protection association's appeal regarding a sewage discharge permit. The association argued it should have been a party to the permit application, but the court found it had no legal interest in the outcome. Consequently, the court ruled the association lacked standing to challenge the permit decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Section 10 of the Administrative Court Act; A water protection association established for local water protection purposes lacks standing to challenge a sewage discharge permit decision if the association's activities do not directly affect its specific rights or duties in the permit proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
standing to sue water protection association sewage discharge permit administrative standing legal interest requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Section 10 of the Administrative Court Act

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO decision T:4280, A:27.10.1977
KHO decision T:1310, A:7.4.1986
KHO decision T:446, A:23.2.1989
VYO decision T:56/1989, A:31.3.1989
VYO decision T:112/1989, A:16.6.1989
KHO decision T:100, A:12.1.1990
AI generated
kho-precedent_2016_10
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding nuclear plant expropriation, ruling Aarhus Convention does not apply to expropriation decisions.
kko-precedent_1994_106
Supreme Court dismisses water area division request due to significant loss of recreational fishing utility for other owners.
admin_1989_water-superior__56
Residential associations not affected by lake regulation denied standing as parties in licensing case.
kko-precedent_1991_108
Supreme Court rules that a jointly demised water area is subject to Chapter 6 of the Partition Act, not Chapter 4.
labour_2002_62
Labor court dismisses appeal by non-signatory union against collective agreement general binding force decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Jäteveden johtamishanke ei vaikuttanut rekisteröidyn, paikallisen

vesiensuojeluedun ajamista varten perustetun vesiensuojeluyhdistyksen

etuun ja oikeuteen siten, että se olisi

ollut jäteveden johtamista koskevassa lupa-asiassa asianosaisen

asemassa. Yhdistyksen valitus jätettiin tutkimatta.

KHO:n päätös T:4280, A:27.10.1977

KHO:n päätös T:1310, A:7.4.1986

KHO:n päätös T:446, A:23.2.1989

VYO:n päätös T:56/1989, A:31.3.1989

VYO:n päätös T:112/1989, A:16.6.1989 (KHO: Ei valituslupaa)

KHO:n päätös T:100, A:12.1.1990: Ei valituslupaa