Uudenmaan LO 28.11.1989 1742/II
AI generated
Parking ban sign does not apply to pedestrian crossing street as traffic zone is limited.
Finland (FI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's claim that a parking prohibition sign did not cover the pedestrian crossing street. The defendant argued the sign's traffic zone included the intersection, but the court found the zone ended before the crosswalk. Consequently, the parking ban was deemed inapplicable to vehicles using the pedestrian crossing.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedTieliikenneA 16 §; TieliikenneA 16 § 3. A parking prohibition sign's traffic zone is determined by its physical placement and does not automatically extend to include a pedestrian crossing street if the zone terminates prior to the intersection.
Keywords
AI generated
parking prohibition sign
traffic zone determination
pedestrian crossing street
sign placement limits
administrative court ruling
Cited Legislation
AI generatedTieliikenneA 16 § 3
Related Decisions
AI generatedadmin_1997_uusimaa-county__821
Parking sign area not cut by crossing street; traffic sign regulation upheld.
admin_1997_hame-county__715
Parking fine dismissed because vehicle was not within the prohibited parking zone defined by the sign.
kho-other_2016_5593
Supreme Administrative Court reversed lower court, ruling parking fine valid when original disability permit was missing, not a copy.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:70
Supreme Court dismisses driver's liability for traffic safety violation where no right-of-way was indicated but excessive speed caused collision.
admin_2009_helsinki__972
Court dismissed parking fine as general traffic rules override disabled parking permit when causing obstruction.
Full text
Pysäköinti kielletty -liikennemerkin vaikutusalue ei
pääty risteävään kevyen liikenteen väylään ( kävelykatu ).
TieliikenneA 16 § merkki 372