Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Kuopion LO 16.1.1989 21/II AI generated

County court dismissed municipality's claim for social services costs when private family care contract was fulfilled with public aid.

Case Number Kuopion LO 16.1.1989 21/II
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The County Administrative Court dismissed the municipality's request for reimbursement of social services costs from the inter-municipal association or the home municipality. The municipality had provided home care to a family member while the family cared for a developmentally disabled person under a private care contract. The court ruled that the municipality's aid was intended to fulfill the private contract's terms, not to create a public law debt for the other municipalities.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalihuoltolain 13 § 1 mom 1 kohta; 14 §; 51 §: When public authorities provide assistance to fulfill a private care contract, no public law reimbursement obligation arises for other municipalities unless the contract itself mandates it.

Keywords

AI generated
private care contract social services costs municipal reimbursement public law debt developmental disability home care aid family care agreement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalihuoltolain 13 § 1 mom 1 kohta
Sosiaalihuoltolain 14 §
Sosiaalihuoltolain 51 §
AI generated
admin_1995_turku-and-pori-county__459
County court ruled municipality cannot unilaterally terminate family care contract due to changed circumstances.
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__1370
Administrative court dismissed child care support recovery claim due to improper jurisdiction under local court rules.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:143
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed municipality's liability for foster care costs when child placement was arranged via court order after guardian's death.
admin_1994_northern-karelia-county__560
County court allows partial compensation to caregiver for loss of earnings before service housing was mandated.
admin_1987_turku-and-pori-county__958
Administrative court dismisses appeal against federation's refusal to admit developmentally disabled person to care home.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kehitysvammaisten hoitolaitosta ylläpitävä kuntainliitto oli

T:n kunnassa asuvien P ja N:n kanssa 8.3.1988 solmimansa perhehoitosopimuksen

mukaisesti sijoittanut näiden perheeseen

hoidettavaksi R:n kunnasta olevan kehitysvammaisen K:n. Sopimuksen

mukaan sijoittaja huolehti mm. siitä, että perhehoitaja

sai tarvittaessa sijaisen tai vaihtoehtoisesti hoitojärjestelyt.

T:n kunta oli N:n pyynnöstä antanut 75 tuntia kotipalveluapua

ajalle 6. - 17.6.1988, jolloin N oli laitoskuntoutuksessa

eikä voinut osallistua perheeseen sijoitettujen 7

kehitysvammaisen hoitoon. T:n kunta vaati vaihtoehtoisesti

joko kuntainliiton tai K:n kotikunnan velvoittamista korvaamaan

sosiaalihuoltolain nojalla kotipalvelun kustannuksista

1/7 K:n osuutena.

Lääninoikeus hylkäsi hakemuksen. T:n kunnan katsottiin avustaneen

N:n perhettä yksityisoikeudellisen perhehoitosopimuksen

ehtojen täyttämiseksi. R:n kunnalle ja kuntainliitolle

ei katsottu syntyneen julkisoikeudellista maksuvelvollisuutta

T:n kunnalle.

SosiaalihuoltoL 13 § 1 mom 1 kohta

SosiaalihuoltoL 14 §

SosiaalihuoltoL 51 §