Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Ahvenanmaan LO 30.3.1989 65 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because social support revocation was not yet legally determined by the social committee.

Case Number Ahvenanmaan LO 30.3.1989 65
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Social Committee's decision to revoke monthly support. The applicant argued the support should be granted without revocation, but the Committee had not yet made a binding decision on the revocation itself. The court ruled that since the revocation question was not finally decided, the appeal could not be heard and the matter must be separately initiated.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

37 § socialvårdslagen; A claim for social support without revocation is inadmissible if the revocation has not been legally determined or decided in a binding manner.

Keywords

AI generated
social support revocation administrative appeal dismissal procedural prerequisite binding decision requirement separate legal action

Cited Legislation

AI generated
37 § socialvårdslagen
AI generated
admin_1992_oulu-county__580
Social assistance court ruled that converting non-recoverable support to advance support requires separate recovery proceedings.
admin_2005_turku__171
Social Board lacked authority to deduct July support from September payment due to pending administrative dispute.
kho-precedent_1997_68
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed recovery of student loan funds as income under social assistance law.
insurance_2009_4924-2009
Insurance court dismissed late appeal due to lack of force majeure, but voided decision for improper service to minor without guardian.
insurance_2011_6713-2009
Insurance court dismissed appeal; waiver of recovery requires futile collection or disproportionate costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Socialnämnd beviljade sökande utkomststöd för månatligt uppehälle,

vilket utkomststöd skulle återindrivas. Besvären över

socialnämndens beslut, i vilka yrkades att utkomststödet

skulle beviljas utan återkrav, förkastades, eftersom frågan

om utkomststödet skall återindrivas inte hade avgjorts eller

ens kunnat avgöras på ett för besväranden bindande sätt genom

socialnämndens beslut, utan ärendet kunde på stadgat sätt

skilt bringas för avgörande genom ansökan om återindrivning

av utkomststöd.

37 § socialvårdslagen