Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 10.6.1988 49/1988 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed fishing and private owners' objections to a state-funded emergency harbor permit.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 10.6.1988 49/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed objections from the fishing community and two private owners regarding a permit for a public boat landing on a lake island. The municipality sought approval to build a facility with 25 berths using state funds for an emergency harbor, as no other suitable public land existed on the island. The court upheld the Water Resources Authority's decision, noting the project met general public need and the permit was valid despite the objections.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 2 luku 3 §; VesiL 2 luku 6 § 2 mom; VesiL 2 luku 8 §: The court established that a permit for a public boat landing on a lake island is valid when the project serves general public need and no other suitable public land is available, overriding objections from fishing communities and private owners.

Keywords

AI generated
emergency harbor permit lake island public land general public need fishing community objection private owner rights water resources authority administrative review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 2 luku 3 §
VesiL 2 luku 6 § 2 mom
VesiL 2 luku 8 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:1987-A-II-64
KHO:1988-A-II-89
AI generated
admin_1989_water-superior__225
Administrative court dismissed a bridge construction permit due to disproportionate environmental and landscape harm.
admin_2011_vaasa__486
Court orders EIA procedure for quarrying linked to port expansion, quashing permit without assessment.
kho-other_2014_3904
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal, ruling separate water and building permit conditions must be evaluated together by the authority.
admin_1999_water-superior__56
Administrative court quashes water authority's refusal to permit beach restoration and canal widening project.
admin_2011_oulu__326
Administrative court dismissed wind turbine permit appeal due to landscape damage on nationally valued Hailuoto island.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kunta haki lupaa rakentaa rantautumispaikka poijuineen ja rannan

suuntaisine laitureineen omistamansa tilan edustalle saareen.

Alueelle oli suunniteltu 25 venepaikkaa. Rantautumispaikka

rakennettaisiin suurimmaksi osaksi valtion rahoituksen

turvin hätäsatamaksikin soveltuvaan, tilapäiseen rantautumiseen

tavanomaisesti käytettyyn paikkaan laivaväylän läheisyyteen

suureen järvenselän rannalle. Saaressa ei ollut muita

tähän tarkoitukseen soveliaita, kunnan omistamia rantoja. VEO

katsoi hankkeen yleisen tarpeen vaatimaksi ja myönsi luvan

rakentamiseen sekä käyttöoikeuden hankkeeseen tarvittavaan

jakokunnan vesialueeseen. Kalastuskunnan ja kahden huvilanomistajan

haettua muutosta VYO ei muuttanut VEO:n päätöstä.

VesiL 2 luku 3 §

VesiL 2 luku 6 § 2 mom

VesiL 2 luku 8 §

KHO:1987-A-II-64

KHO:1988-A-II-89

Lainvoimainen