Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vesiylioikeus 22.4.1988 34/1988 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal regarding lost right to object due to misleading address instructions.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 22.4.1988 34/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the applicant's appeal, ruling that the right to object was not lost due to a misleading address provided by the water district. Although the applicant submitted the notice to the wrong engineer's address, the court found this error did not constitute a waiver of procedural rights. Consequently, the decision regarding the loss of the right to object was overturned, and the matter was remanded for immediate review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 18 luku 11 § 1 mom; The right to object is not lost merely because a notice was sent to an incorrect address if the error was caused by misleading instructions from the authority, provided the notice was submitted within the statutory period.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal procedural waiver misleading address water district notice statutory deadline right to object remand for review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 18 luku 11 § 1 mom (30.4.1987/467)
VesiL 18 luku 11 § 1 mom (30.4.1987/467)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VYO:n päätös T:1/1985, A:26.12.1985
VYO:n päätös T:1/1985, A:26.12.1985
AI generated
kko-precedent_1993_85
Supreme Court allows appeal dismissed by lower court due to procedural error regarding late submission of appeal document.
insurance_2007_3099-2006
Insurance court dismissed appeal on merits but ordered state to pay applicant's legal costs due to erroneous application of cost rules.
kko-precedent_2004_5
Supreme Court allows appeal against land court dismissal due to late filing by applying procedural rules from civil procedure code.
admin_2009_turku__324
Administrative court dismissed Maritime Board's revocation of pilot license due to lack of legal certainty and safety risk.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2021:122
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal dismissed for late filing due to missing office hours notice in appeal documents.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kun toimitusmiesten lausuntoa koskevassa kuulutuksessa muistutusten

toimittamista koskevien ohjeiden lisäksi määräävällä

paikalla ollut toimitusinsinöörin osoite oli ollut omiaan harhaanjohtamaan

valittajaa siitä, mihin osoitteeseen muistutukset

tuli toimittaa, ei muutoksenhakija, joka oli määräajassa

toimittanut muistutuksensa toimitusinsinöörille, ollut kerrotun

erehdyksen vuoksi menettänyt puhevaltaansa, vaikka muistutus

olikin vesipiiristä toimitettu VEO:lle vasta muistutukselle

säädetyn määräajan jälkeen. VEO:n päätös siltä osin kuin

valittajan oli katsottu menettäneen puhevaltansa, kumottiin ja

hänen vaatimuksensa otettiin VYO:ssa välittömästi tutkittavaksi.

VesiL 18 luku 11 § 1 mom (30.4.1987/467)

VYO:n päätös T:1/1985, A:26.12.1985

Lainvoimainen