Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Vesiylioikeus 30.12.1988 156/1988 AI generated

Water court dismissed water association's sale of land to association, upholding owner's rights and co-ownership veto rights.

Case Number Vesiylioikeus 30.12.1988 156/1988
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the water association's appeal regarding the sale of land to the association itself. The water association argued that the sale violated co-ownership rights, but the court found the transaction did not infringe upon the original owner's interests or their right to use co-ownership veto power. Consequently, the court ruled that the sale was valid and the association's claims were unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

VesiL 5 luku 14 §; VesiL 5 luku 64 §; VesiL 22 luku 4 § 3 mom: The sale of property to a water association does not violate the rights of the former owner or the co-ownership veto right if the co-owners did not exercise their veto power.

Keywords

AI generated
water association property rights co-ownership veto power land sale validity former owner rights administrative court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
VesiL 5 luku 14 §
VesiL 5 luku 64 §
VesiL 22 luku 4 § 3 mom
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Uittoyhdistyksen omaisuudeksi tulleen kiinteän omaisuuden

myynti yhtiölle ei koskenut kiinteän omaisuuden aikaisemman

omistajan, jakokunnan etua ja oikeutta sillä tavoin, että jakokunnalla

olisi asiassa ollut oikeus käyttää asiaosaisen puhevaltaa.

VYO jätti jakokunnan muutoksenhakemuksessaan esittämät

vaatimukset tutkimatta.

VesiL 5 luku 14 §

VesiL 5 luku 64 §

VesiL 22 luku 4 § 3 mom

Lainvoimainen