Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan LO 21.4.1988 1671 AI generated

Administrative court quashed tax assessments against a partnership and its liable partner, remanding the case for re-evaluation.

Case Number Vaasan LO 21.4.1988 1671
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court quashed the tax assessments levied against a limited partnership and its liable partner, ordering the case to be remanded to the tax board. The state prosecutor argued that income and assets should be taxed against the liable partner rather than the entity itself. The court agreed, finding that the legal characterization of the taxpayer required a different assessment approach than previously applied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Tax Administration Act; Limited Partnership Act: When a limited partnership is assessed as a separate taxpayer, the court may quash such assessments if the liable partner should instead be the primary taxpayer for income and assets.

Keywords

AI generated
limited partnership taxation liable partner status tax assessment quashing administrative review income tax liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Tax Administration Act
Limited Partnership Act
AI generated
admin_1986_kuopio-county__513
Administrative court dismissed appeal; registered open company taxed separately despite partner's request for individual taxation under Tax Act.
admin_1987_hame-county__484
Court ruled that transferring profits to silent partners constitutes a taxable gift under inheritance and gift tax law.
admin_2001_turku__583
Administrative court remanded tax case to apply income assessment rule instead of unproven asset increase.
admin_2012_vaasa__2471
Administrative court upheld tax assessment after overturning a prior decision that reduced taxable income due to new information.
admin_1989_uusimaa-county__287
Administrative court dismissed buyer's appeal for procedural error regarding tax authority's failure to hear buyer before ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Kommandiittiyhtiötä on verotettu eri verovelvollisena. Valtionasiamiehen

vaadittua, että tulosta ja varallisuudesta

oli yhtiön sijasta verotettava vastuunalaista yhtiömiestä,

lääninoikeus kumosi yhtiön ja vastuunalaisen yhtiömiehen

valtionverotukset ja palautti asian verolautakunnalle uudelleen

käsiteltäväksi. Verovuosi 1983.

Äänestys 2-1. Eri mieltä ollut jäsen kumosi verotukset myös

kunnallisverotuksen osalta.

Andersson: Överklagbarhet och besvärsrätt i förvaltningsrätten

(1970) s. 284-285

Kuokkanen: Verotus 5/67 s.192-193

Suviranta: Menettelynyhteydestä verotusasioissa - Juhlajulkaisu

Ilmari Caseliuksen ja Aarne Rekolan 70-vuotispäivänä

29.4.1963 (1963) s. 245-259