Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 21.3.1988 292/III AI generated

Court allows gift tax on loans used as gift proceeds despite under-reporting in declarations.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 21.3.1988 292/III
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court ruled that the taxpayer, spouse, and minor child must pay gift tax on the total value of gifts received. Although the tax declarations stated the funds were used to repay a loan in the taxpayer's name, the court found the taxpayer to be the actual beneficiary of the assets. Consequently, the court ordered the payment of gift tax on the combined amount of the gifts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

PerVL 1 §; PerVL 10 §: When gift proceeds are used to repay a debt in the recipient's name, the recipient is deemed the actual beneficiary and liable for gift tax on the total gift value.

Keywords

AI generated
gift tax liability actual beneficiary determination loan repayment use gift declaration reporting taxable amount calculation family member gifts administrative court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
PerVL 1 §
PerVL 10 §
AI generated
kho-precedent_2000_59
Inheritance gift shares tax deduction rule applied to sale proceeds instead of gift date value.
kho-precedent_2016_160
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court dismissed transfer tax on a gift of apartment shares where the company's share was not agreed as consideration.
kho-precedent_2016_104
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court allows gift tax deduction for retained fund assets despite equal shareholder rights.
admin_1993_mikkeli-county__93
Administrative court dismissed tax deduction claim where gift-like property transfer lacked sufficient consideration.
kho-precedent_2015_154
Swedish Supreme Administrative Court allows inheritance tax relief for share gifts where donor retains voting rights.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Verovelvollinen, hänen puolisonsa ja alaikäinen lapsensa

olivat saaneet kukin lahjanantajalta rahalahjan, jonka arvo

oli jäänyt alle verotettavan määrän. Lahjoituspäivänä päivätyissä

lahjaveroilmoituksissa oli ilmoitettu, että lahjana

saadut rahavarat käytetään verovelvollisen nimissä olevan

lahjanantajalta saadun asuntolainan lyhennykseen. Verovelvollinen

katsottiin hänen omaisuutensa rahoittamiseen

käytettäväksi tarkoitettujen rahalahjojen todelliseksi saajaksi

ja hänen suoritettavakseen oli määrättävä lahjavero

lahjojen yhteismäärästä. Verovuosi 1987.

PerVL 1 §