Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Keski-Suomen LO 1.9.1988 970 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal as procedural error required correction under administrative procedure law.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 1.9.1988 970
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against a social board's decision regarding daycare fees because the plaintiff failed to submit the decision for review in the required order. Consequently, the administrative authority's decision became final and binding. The court ruled that the plaintiff's request must be treated as a correction of a procedural error under the Administrative Procedure Act, which precludes seeking a change through an appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Sosiaalihuoltolaki 45 §; Hallintomenettelylaki 26 §, 28 § 4 momentti: If a party fails to submit a final administrative decision for review in the prescribed order, the decision becomes final; such a request is treated as a correction of a procedural error, not a ground for appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural error correction final administrative decision social board decision daycare fee appeal administrative procedure law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 45 §
Hallintomenettelylaki 26 §
Hallintomenettelylaki 28 § 4 momentti
AI generated
kho-precedent_2004_75
Supreme Administrative Court quashes decisions for failing to notify a permanent holder of a public office of termination.
admin_1994_northern-karelia-county__994
Administrative court dismissed appeal for salary correction, ruling appeal must go to county court not ministry.
kho-precedent_2004_51
Correction request under municipal law did not extend the deadline for market court application.
admin_1989_turku-and-pori-county__589
Administrative court dismissed appeal, ruling vacation pay decisions require appeal to the agricultural committee, not the county court.
admin_1995_uusimaa-county__1375
Administrative court allows appeal on land value despite prior appeal on inheritance tax due to distinct legal issues.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S vaati sosiaalilautakunnalta päivähoitomaksua koskeneen viranhaltijan päätöksen oikaisemista. Hän ei ollut saattanut viranhaltijan antamaa päätöstä asianmukaisessa järjestyksessä lautakunnan käsiteltäväksi. Viranhaltijan päätös oli näin ollen tullut lainvoimaiseksi. Lääninoikeus ei tutkinut S:n sosiaalilautakunnan päätöksestä tekemää valitusta, koska S:n oikaisuvaatimusta oli pidettävä hallintomenettelylain mukaisena asiavirheen korjaamisvaatimuksena, johon annettuun päätökseen ei saanut hakea valittamalla muutosta.

SosiaalihuoltoL 45 §

HallintomenettelyL 26 §

HallintomenettelyL 28 § 4 mom