Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Keski-Suomen LO 14.12.1988 1419 AI generated

Driving school exemption for family member denied due to lack of special difficulty evidence.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 14.12.1988 1419
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The County Administrative Court overturned the lower court's dismissal of a driving school exemption request based on family ties. The applicant argued that living with her spouse in the same household created special difficulties requiring exemption, but the lower court found no evidence of such hardship. The court held that while family members can teach each other, the lower court erred by dismissing the request without verifying whether the specific circumstances actually necessitated an exemption.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

TLL 68 § 1 mom 2 kohta; Driving school exemptions for family members require proof of special difficulties, not merely the existence of a family relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
driving school exemption family member instruction special difficulties requirement administrative burden evidence of hardship

Cited Legislation

AI generated
TLL 68 § 1 mom 2 kohta
AI generated
admin_2004_turku__299
Administrative court allows driving school license application by rejecting lower court's financial requirement error.
insurance_2008_7005-2007
Student bus subsidy allowed when school commute becomes too difficult due to childcare obligations.
admin_1998_turku-and-pori-county__39
Student welfare claim dismissed because available student grants were counted as income.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2020:60
Supreme Administrative Court allows free school transport as reasonable accommodation for child with rare genetic disease.
admin_1998_turku-and-pori-county__512
Administrative court allows food support to student with credit issues, ruling total denial violates human dignity rights.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä oli saattoiko hakemuksen saman perheen jäsenelle ajokortin saamiseksi annettavasta opetuksesta hylätä sillä perusteella, ettei autokouluopetukseen osallistuminen tuottanut opetettavalle erityisiä vaikeuksia.

Nimismies hylkäsi T:n opetuslupahakemuksen, koska hänen kanssaan avioliitonomaisissa olosuhteissa samassa taloudessa eläneen H:n taloudellisista tai muistakaan olosuhteista ei ollut esitetty sellaisia erityisiä seikkoja, jotka olisivat osoittaneet autokouluopetukseen osallistumisen tuottavan erityisiä vaikeuksia.

Lääninoikeus totesi, että poliisi voi oikeuttaa piirissään asuvan ajokortin haltijan antamaan määrätylle henkilölle opetusta ajokortin saamiseksi, jos opettaja ja opetettava ovat saman perheen jäseniä. Kun T:tä ja H:ta oli pidettävä saman perheen jäseninä, nimismiehen ei olisi käyttämällään perusteella tullut hylätä T:n hakemusta, vaan myöntää lupa, mikäli erityisiä syitä sen epäämiseen ei ollut.

TLL 68 § 1 mom 2 kohta