Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Keski-Suomen LO 18.11.1988 1309 AI generated

Winter storage of a sailboat on a construction site did not constitute untidiness or environmental degradation under the Building Act.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 18.11.1988 1309
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the neighbor's complaint regarding the winter storage of a sailboat on the plaintiff's construction site. The lower court found that the boat, situated between the properties, did not impair visibility or significantly degrade the environment. Consequently, the court ruled that the storage did not violate the Building Act's requirements for tidiness or environmental protection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Building Act s. 124 § 1 mom; s. 124 § 2 mom: The storage of a sailboat during winter on a construction site does not constitute untidiness or environmental degradation if it does not significantly impair the surroundings or contradict the site's intended use.

Keywords

AI generated
winter storage sailboat construction site Building Act environmental degradation neighbor dispute tidiness requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Building Act s. 124 § 1 mom
Building Act s. 124 § 2 mom
AI generated
kko-precedent_2004_7
Supreme Court allows appeal on detention grounds where no statutory conditions exist, overriding administrative law restrictions.
kho-other_2023_2451
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal, upholding ELY Centre's order to protect dormouse habitats despite procedural irregularities.
admin_1990_uusimaa-county__1761
Administrative court dismissed waste water discharge order as unnecessary for health protection on groundwater area.
kho-other_2026_658
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against administrative court dismissal of building relocation order based on private contract dispute.
kho-other_2016_2010
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against water authority's rejection of flood damage compensation claim. Damages not covered by Water Act as caused by natural events, not regulation violations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä oli aiheuttiko purjeveneen talvisäilytys rakennuspaikalla epäsiisteyttä ja rumensiko vene ympäristöä.

J säilytti talvisin 7,7 m mittaista purjevenettään 800 neliömetrin suuruisella rakennuskaavan mukaisella omakotikiinteistöllään. Vene sijaitsi J:n ja hänen naapurinsa omakotitalon välissä. Se ei haitannut naapurin näkyvyyttä.

Lääninoikeus katsoi, ettei veneen talvisäilytyksen voitu katsoa aiheuttavan epäsiisteyttä eikä rumentavan ympäristöä siinä määrin, että säilytys olisi tämän vuoksi tullut kieltää. Veneen säilyttämistä ei myöskään pidetty rakennuspaikan käyttötarkoituksen vastaisena.

Rakennuslaki 124 § 1 mom