Social board lacked jurisdiction to examine a claim for withholding support when support was granted by another municipality.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the Social Board's decision to examine a request for withholding child support. The Social Board had previously granted support based on non-payment of maintenance and thus acquired the right to collect all outstanding support from the obligor. However, the Board lacked jurisdiction to review the request for withholding support because the support had been granted by a different municipality's Social Board. The court ruled that jurisdiction to examine such withholding requests belongs exclusively to the municipality that originally granted the support, not the one collecting arrears.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedElatusturvaL 21 §; The Social Board that granted support lacks jurisdiction to examine a request for withholding support if that support was granted by another municipality's Social Board.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Se sosiaalilautakunta, joka oli viimeksi myöntänyt elatustukea
elatusavun maksamisen laiminlyömisen perusteella, ja jolle
sen vuoksi kuului kaikkien perimättä olevien elatusapuerien
periminen, ei ollut toimivaltainen tutkimaan elatusvelvollisen
hakemusta elatustuen perimättä jättämisestä siltä
osin kuin tukea oli myöntänyt toisen kunnan sosiaalilautakun-
ta.
ElatusturvaL 21 §