Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Uudenmaan LO 20.1.1987 51/II AI generated

County court lacks jurisdiction to review a municipality's loss of purchase right due to non-compliance with the Purchase Right Act.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 20.1.1987 51/II
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, ruling that it lacks jurisdiction to examine whether a municipality lost its purchase right by failing to fulfill duties under Section 9 of the Purchase Right Act. The plaintiff argued the municipality acted unlawfully, but the court determined such a review falls outside the administrative court's competence. Consequently, the case was rejected because the specific legal question regarding the loss of purchase right is not within the scope of administrative court review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

EtuostoL 9 §; EtuostoL 10 §; EtuostoL 22 § 1 mom: The administrative court lacks jurisdiction to review whether a municipality has lost its purchase right due to non-compliance with statutory duties.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative court jurisdiction purchase right act municipal duties loss of purchase right competence limitation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
EtuostoL 9 §
EtuostoL 10 §
EtuostoL 22 § 1 mom
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sen seikan tutkiminen, onko kunta menettänyt etuosto-oikeuden

laiminlyömällä, mitä sen tehtäväksi on etuostolain

9 §:ssä säädetty, ei kuulu lääninoikeuden toimivaltaan.

EtuostoL 9 §

EtuostoL 10 §

EtuostoL 22 § 1 mom