Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 31.12.1987 2007/II AI generated

Administrative court dismissed parking fine claim due to failure to notify within six months under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 31.12.1987 2007/II
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a parking violation fine because the required notification under the Administrative Procedure Act was not provided within the statutory six-month period. The plaintiff argued for the fine's validity, but the court noted that the violation occurred over six months prior to the notification. Consequently, the court ruled that the right to receive the fine had expired due to the procedural delay.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Administrative Procedure Act s. 8; Parking Fine Act s. 11, s. 22: Failure to notify a parking violation within six months of the violation date extinguishes the right to receive the fine.

Keywords

AI generated
Administrative Procedure Act parking violation fine notification requirement six-month limitation extinguishment of right administrative procedure statutory deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Administrative Procedure Act s. 8
Parking Fine Act s. 11
Parking Fine Act s. 22

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO T:1055 A:6.4.1989
AI generated
admin_2011_vaasa__74
Court dismissed parking fine appeal as unpaid parking ticket display is essential to the system.
kho-precedent_2014_170
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed Patent Office's rejection of a patent opposition for non-payment of fees not mandated by law.
admin_2007_oulu__364
Court dismissed parking fine for failure to display ticket, ruling it violates principle of legality.
admin_1991_turku-and-pori-county__858
Administrative court dismissed appeal where plaintiff failed to submit counter-argument to parking fine demand.
admin_1999_central-finland-county__380
Court dismissed appeal allowing parking fine based on new violation reason despite initial denial.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pysäköintivirhemaksua koskeva maksumääräys on annettava tiedoksi

tiedoksiannosta hallintoasioissa annetun lain 8 §:n

mukaisesti. Kun näin ei ollut menetelty ja virheen tekopäivästä

oli kulunut enemmän kuin kuusi kuukautta, oli oikeus

pysäköintivirhemaksun saamiseen rauennut. Asia on käsitelty

lääninoikeudessa hallintoriitana.

L pysäköintivirhemaksusta 11 §

L pysäköintivirhemaksusta 22 §

HTiedL 8 §

KHO:n päätös T:1055 A:6.4.1989 : Ei muutosta lopputulokseen,

päätös talennettu oikeustapausrekisteriin (FKHO)