Investment allowance not treated as tax relief requiring addition to income for discretionary tax assessment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court of Uusimaa upheld the tax authority's decision regarding the 1983 tax year. The court determined that the investment allowance did not qualify as tax relief necessitating its addition to the calculated income for discretionary tax assessment purposes. Consequently, the tax authority was permitted to exclude the allowance from the income base without violating statutory requirements.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedInvestment allowance Act s. 6; Income Tax Act s. 72 (1) no. 4: An investment allowance is not considered tax relief that must be added to the calculated income when examining the conditions for discretionary tax assessment.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Investointitalletuksen koron verovapautta ei pidetty sellaisena
veronhuojennuksena, jonka määrä olisi lisättävä laskelmanmukaiseen
tuloon harkintaverotuksen edellytyksiä tutkittaessa
ja joka olisi vähennettävä harkinnalla vahvistetusta
määrästä. Verovuosi 1983.
InvestointivarausL 6 §
VerotusL 72 § 1 mom 4 kohta
Kts. myös ULO A:19.3.1987 T:199/VI
KHO:n päätös T:259 A:21.1.1988 : KHO toisin, päätös tallennettu
oikeustapausrekisteriin (FKHO)