Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 24.11.1987 1779/II AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal; vehicle transfer errors do not remove compensation liability for transfer costs.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 24.11.1987 1779/II
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Uusimaa dismissed the applicant's appeal regarding vehicle transfer costs. The applicant argued that errors during the vehicle transfer and the lack of formal transfer notification should negate the liability to pay transfer expenses. The court held that such procedural errors or omissions do not legally extinguish the obligation to compensate for the costs incurred during the transfer process.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lajoneuvojen siirtämisestä ja romuajoneuvojen hävittämisestä 2 § 2 kohta; 9 § 1 mom; 13 §: Errors in vehicle transfer procedures or failure to notify do not remove the legal obligation to compensate for transfer costs.

Keywords

AI generated
vehicle transfer costs compensation liability administrative appeal procedural error transfer notification scrap vehicle disposal cost reimbursement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lajoneuvojen siirtämisestä ja romuajoneuvojen hävittämisestä 2 § 2 kohta
Lajoneuvojen siirtämisestä ja romuajoneuvojen hävittämisestä 9 § 1 mom
Lajoneuvojen siirtämisestä ja romuajoneuvojen hävittämisestä 13 §
AI generated
admin_2016_eastern-finland__1002
Court dismissed appeal against vehicle towing costs, ruling owner liable despite being abroad at time of incident.
market_2022_H85
Market Court dismisses trademark dispute but orders defendant to pay plaintiff's legal costs due to unfairness.
kko-precedent_1996_107
Supreme Court allows traffic offense charge against driver who failed to yield despite other party's violation.
appeal_1984_rovaniemi__1120
Consumer rejected repair of minor car defects; court dismissed price reduction claim due to lack of value loss evidence.
kko-precedent_1995_8
Supreme Court voids old fines for wrong person but dismisses newer ones due to statute of limitations.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Lähisiirrossa ajoneuvon sijoittamisessa mahdollisesti tapahtunut

virhe ei poistanut siirtokustannusten korvausvelvollisuutta.

Myöskään siirrosta ilmoittamisella ei ollut oikeudellista

merkitystä siirtokustannusten korvauspäätöksen kan-

nalta.

L ajoneuvojen siirtämisesta ja romuajoneuvojen hävittämises-

tä 2 § 2 kohta

L ajoneuvojen siirtämisestä ja romuajoneuvojen hävittämisesta

9 § 1 mom

L ajoneuvojen siirtämisestä ja romuajoneuvojen hävittämises-

tä 13 §