Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Keski-Suomen LO 14.5.1987 500 AI generated

Building permit for sauna denied because detached house not yet considered existing residence.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 14.5.1987 500
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The County Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's request for a building permit for a sauna attached to a detached house. The lower authority had granted the permit, reasoning the sauna was an economic building linked to an existing residence, but the court found the detached house did not yet qualify as an existing residence. Consequently, the permit was invalid without a specific exception approval under the Building Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Building Act s. 5 (3); A building permit for an economic building attached to a detached house requires an exception approval if the detached house is not yet considered an existing residence.

Keywords

AI generated
Building Act existing residence detached house economic building exception approval building permit sauna construction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Building Act s. 5 (3)
AI generated
admin_1987_central-finland-county__1173
Administrative court dismissed appeal against building authority's refusal to deviate from exception permit under Building Act s. 132.2.
admin_2016_aland__73
Administrative court dismissed building permit deviation due to non-fulfilled planning area requirements and building code limits.
kho-other_2016_3752
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; planning deviation violates equal treatment and causes harm to plan implementation.
admin_1989_turku-and-pori-county__141
Shareholder's standing to appeal a building permit granted to the company for a sauna.
kho-other_2016_5152
Court dismisses appeal as converting a public housing building to private rental violates zoning without exception.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rakennuslautakunta myönsi V:lle lainvoimaisen rantakaavasäännöksistä myönnetyn poikkeusluvan perusteella rakennusluvan omakotitalon rakentamiseen. Todettuaan rakennusluvan myönnetyksi lautakunta myönsi V:lle luvan myös rantasaunan rakentamiseen, koska saunaa voitiin pitää jo olemassa olevaan asuinrakennukseen liittyvänä talousrakennuksena. Lääninoikeus katsoi, ettei omakotitaloa voitu vielä pitää olemassa olevana asuntona. Rantasaunalle ei siten voitu myöntää rakennuslupaa ilman asianmukaista poikkeuslupaa.

RakennusL 5 § 3 mom