Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Vaasan LO 21.11.1986 651 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed transfer of appeal to land court due to incorrect authority designation.

Case Number Vaasan LO 21.11.1986 651
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The administrative court dismissed the request to transfer the appeal to the land court because the initial complaint incorrectly designated the regional governor as the authority. The land court had rejected the property owner's claim for compensation regarding road damage, but the complaint listed the wrong respondent. The court ruled that the land court was not the administrative body specified in the relevant statute for such appeals, necessitating a return to the land court for a proper complaint.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

HValL 2 §; HValL 13 § 2 mom: An administrative court cannot transfer an appeal to a land court if the land court does not constitute the administrative authority designated for the appeal in the relevant statute.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal transfer land court jurisdiction incorrect authority designation administrative procedure law complaint correction requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
HValL 2 §
HValL 13 § 2 mom
AI generated
admin_1989_turku-and-pori-county__589
Administrative court dismissed appeal, ruling vacation pay decisions require appeal to the agricultural committee, not the county court.
admin_1993_uusimaa-county__947
Administrative court dismissed appeal as filed late due to statutory time limit rules.
admin_1996_central-finland-county__453
Administrative court dismissed appeal, ordering county council to retry case as correction request under municipal law.
kho-precedent_2004_75
Supreme Administrative Court quashes decisions for failing to notify a permanent holder of a public office of termination.
admin_1992_lapland-county__213
Administrative court dismissed appeal against police doctor's decision on public servant's financial benefit.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Oikeuskysymyksenä asiassa oli, voitiinko maaoikeuden toimivaltaan

kuuluva asia, jossa oli valitusviranomaisen osalta

annettu virheellinen valitusosoitus, siirtää virkateitse maaoikeudelle.

Tielautakunta oli hylännyt kiinteistönomistajan vaatimuksen

yksityisen tien hoitokunnan velvoittamisesta korvaamaan kiinteistölle

tienparannustyöstä aiheutuneeksi väitetty vahinko.

Annetussa valitusosoituksessa valitusviranomaiseksi oli ilmoitettu

lääninhallitus.

Muutosta kysymyksessä olevaan tielautakunnan päätökseen oli

haettava maaoikeudelta. Annetussa valitusosoituksessa valitusviranomaiseksi

oli kuitenkin ilmoitettu lääninhallitus.

Lääninoikeus katsoi, ettei se voinut virkateitse siirtää

valitusta maaoikeudelle, koska maaoikeus ei ollut sellainen

hallintoviranomainen, jota muutoksenhausta hallintoasioissa

annetun lain 2 §:ssä tarkoitettiin. Tämän vuoksi asia palautettiin

tielautakunnalle lainmukaisen valitusosoituksen antamista

varten.

HValL 2 §

HValL 13 § 2 mom