Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Oulun LO 15.4.1986 353/I AI generated

Court dismissed owner's appeal against fine for keeping bus on parking lot due to nuisance.

Case Number Oulun LO 15.4.1986 353/I
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The County Administrative Court dismissed the bus owner's appeal against a building committee's order to remove the vehicle from a parking lot. The court found that the bus had been stored for two to three years on a residential lot, effectively functioning as a storage unit that disturbed the residential environment. Consequently, the court upheld the original decision to impose a fine and order removal based on the nuisance caused.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Rakennuslain 144 § 1 momentti; Rakennusasetuksen 76 §: Rakennuslautakunta voi määrätä auton poistamisen tontilta, jos se on säilytetty ja aiheuttaa asuinympäristölle häiriötä.

Keywords

AI generated
residential nuisance vehicle storage building committee order administrative appeal parking lot usage

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Rakennuslain 144 § 1 momentti
Rakennusasetuksen 76 §
AI generated
kho-precedent_2015_119
Court allows parking fine for abandoned vehicles on private area marked as public road under Traffic Act.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2024:82
Supreme Court allows claim that parked moped fire damage is covered by traffic insurance despite improper heating method.
kho-precedent_2014_7
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal; storage shed on beach zone requires planning exception despite adjacent holiday home.
kko-precedent_2006_86
Supreme Court distinguishes theft from unauthorized use, ruling the defendant committed only unauthorized use.
kko-other_2023_299
Supreme Court of Finland rules that taking a car at night constitutes attempted theft, not mere unauthorized use.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Huonokuntoista linja-autoa oli 2-3 vuoden ajan säilytetty

rivitalotontilla autojen pysäköimispaikalla.

Rakennuslautakunta velvoitti linja-auton omistajan sakon

uhalla poistamaan auton rivitalotontilta.

Lääninoikeus katsoi, että linja-autoa on tosiasiassa käytetty

asuntotontilla olevalle autojen paikoitusalueelle sijoitettuna

varastona, joka rumentaa asuinympäristöä. Lääninoikeus

hylkäsi auton omistajan valituksen, jossa oli vaadittu rakennuslautakunnan

päätöksen kumoamista.

RakennusL 144 § 1 mom

RakennusA 76 §