Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Keski-Suomen LO 16.10.1986 1075 AI generated

Child support payment reduced due to lack of stated reason for lower amount in agreement.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 16.10.1986 1075
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the claim because the child support agreement and the custody order failed to specify why the support amount was lower than the current legal standard. Consequently, the authority was legally barred from paying more than the reduced sum established in the custody order. The decision rests on the statutory requirement that any reduction in child support must be explicitly justified in the relevant legal documents.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Lapsen elatuksesta 6 § 4 kohta; A child support agreement or custody order must explicitly state the reason for any reduction in the support amount to allow the authority to pay less than the current statutory standard.

Keywords

AI generated
child support agreement custody order reduced support amount lack of stated reason administrative court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Lapsen elatuksesta 6 § 4 kohta
AI generated
appeal_1980_kouvola__1084
Court allows spousal agreement to override child support modification rules when parties intend to terminate the agreement.
admin_2000_kuopio__463
Administrative court dismissed appeal as no legal need existed to validate cohabiting spouses' maintenance agreement.
kko-other_1997_3027
Supreme Court allows child support despite prior agreement when circumstances change significantly.
kko-precedent_1995_121
Supreme Court allows child support increase where initial award lacked factual basis and was unreasonable.
insurance_2022_21715-2021
Insurance court dismissed appeal for child supplement recovery from unemployment benefits when child support was not established due to inability to pay.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Lasten elatuksesta tehdyssä sopimuksessa ja kihlakunnanoikeuden asumuserotuomiossa ei mainittu syytä miksi lapsille suoritettavaksi määrätty elatusapu oli vahvistettu voimassa olevaa elatustuen määrää pienemmäksi. Tämän vuoksi elatustukea ei voitu suorittaa asumuserotuomiossa vahvistettua määrää enempää.

L lapsen elatuksen turvaamisesta 6 § 4 kohta