Administrative court dismissed appeal for late filing; plaintiff submitted original decision late and completed appeal after deadline expired.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Administrative Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal because the original decision was submitted after the statutory deadline, and the subsequent completion of the appeal document arrived too late. The plaintiff initially provided only the original decision and later supplemented the appeal with a formal document after the time limit had expired. The court ruled that the delay rendered the appeal inadmissible under the Administrative Court Act, as no valid extension was granted.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedHValL 9 §; HValL 10 §; HValL 11 a §: An appeal is inadmissible if the original decision is submitted after the deadline and any supplementary documents arrive after the time limit has expired without a valid extension.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Valittaja oli valitusajan kuluessa toimittanut lääninoikeudelle ainoastaan valituksenalaisen päätöksen alkuperäisenä. Kehotuksesta valittaja täydensi valitustaan myöhemmin valituskirjelmällä. Kun kirjelmä saapui valitusajan päättymisen jälkeen, valitus katsottiin liian myöhään tehdyksi.
HValL 9 §
HValL 10 §
HValL 11 a §