Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Keski-Suomen LO 14.3.1985 261 AI generated

Administrative court dismissed appeal for late filing; plaintiff submitted original decision late and completed appeal after deadline expired.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 14.3.1985 261
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal because the original decision was submitted after the statutory deadline, and the subsequent completion of the appeal document arrived too late. The plaintiff initially provided only the original decision and later supplemented the appeal with a formal document after the time limit had expired. The court ruled that the delay rendered the appeal inadmissible under the Administrative Court Act, as no valid extension was granted.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

HValL 9 §; HValL 10 §; HValL 11 a §: An appeal is inadmissible if the original decision is submitted after the deadline and any supplementary documents arrive after the time limit has expired without a valid extension.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative appeal statutory deadline late filing inadmissible appeal procedural time limit supplementary document administrative court act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
HValL 9 §
HValL 10 §
HValL 11 a §
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Valittaja oli valitusajan kuluessa toimittanut lääninoikeudelle ainoastaan valituksenalaisen päätöksen alkuperäisenä. Kehotuksesta valittaja täydensi valitustaan myöhemmin valituskirjelmällä. Kun kirjelmä saapui valitusajan päättymisen jälkeen, valitus katsottiin liian myöhään tehdyksi.

HValL 9 §

HValL 10 §

HValL 11 a §