Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Uudenmaan LO 28.12.1984 2365/III AI generated

Tax court allows deduction of 400 marks for farm office expenses due to missing audit report.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 28.12.1984 2365/III
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court allowed a tax deduction of 400 marks for farm office expenses because the taxpayer lacked a specific audit report. The taxpayer reported 341,177 marks in milk sales and argued for the standard deduction under the Farm Tax Act. The court applied the precedent from the Supreme Administrative Court to permit the deduction in the absence of detailed expense documentation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Maatilaveloituslaki 4 §; When a specific audit report is missing, the tax authority may apply a standard estimate for farm office expenses, allowing the deduction if the total income exceeds the threshold.

Keywords

AI generated
Farm Tax Act Office Expense Deduction Audit Report Absence Standard Estimate Administrative Court Precedent Milk Sales Income Tax Deduction Allowance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Maatilaveloituslaki 4 §

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO A:31.8.1982 T:3736
KHO A:31.8.1982 T:3736 sikatalouden osalta
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Maatilataloutta harjoittavalla verovelvollisella oli maataloudesta

kaikkiaan 388 933 markan bruttotulot, joista

341 177 markkaa oli kertynyt maitotaloustuotteiden myynnistä.

Hänellä oli oikeus vähentää maatalouden tulosta työhuonekustannuksia

selvityksen puuttuessa menojen määrästä arvion mukaan

400 markkaa. Verovuosi 1981.

MaatVL 4 §

Vrt. KHO A:31.8.1982 T:3736 sikatalouden osalta