Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Uudenmaan LO 17.12.1984 2279/III AI generated

Administrative court dismissed tax advance withholding claim as sports team gift not employee salary.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 17.12.1984 2279/III
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the tax authority's claim for advance withholding on a 540 mark payment made by a sports club to a player as a wedding gift. The authority argued the payment should be taxed under the Advance Withholding Act, but the court found it did not constitute a salary or performance-based payment. Consequently, the court ruled that no advance withholding was required because the transaction lacked the essential characteristics of employment remuneration.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ennakkoperintälain 6 § 1 momentin 1 kohta; Ennakkoperintälain 4 §: A sports club's monetary gift to a player for a wedding is not considered salary or performance payment under the Advance Withholding Act, thus exempting it from advance withholding obligations.

Keywords

AI generated
sports club gift wedding present advance withholding employee salary tax performance payment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ennakkoperintälain 6 § 1 momentin 1 kohta
Ennakkoperintälain 4 §
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Urheiluseura oli osallistunut eräälle sen pelaajalle annettavaan

häälahjaan 540 markan rahamäärällä. Seuran osuutta lahjasta

ei pidetty seuran antamana ennakkoperintälain 6 §:n 1

momentin 1 kohdassa tarkoitettuna urheilijan palkkiona. Kun

kysymyksessä ei ollut myöskään sanotun lain 4 §:ssä tarkoitettu

suoritus, sen määrästä ei ollut toimitettava ennakonpidätystä.

Verovuosi 1980.

EnnakkoperintäL 6 § 1 mom 1 kohta

EnnakkoperintäL 4 §