Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Uudenmaan LO 13.12.1984 2150/II AI generated

Administrative court dismissed claim to recover wrongly paid child support already deducted from future payments.

Case Number Uudenmaan LO 13.12.1984 2150/II
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court of Uusimaa rejected the applicant's request to recover child support erroneously paid between September 1982 and March 1983. The applicant had moved to another municipality in November 1983, which had already deducted the overpaid amount from future support payments before the applicant's release application was filed with the county court. The court ruled that since the erroneous payment was recovered prior to the release application's admissibility, the claim could not be granted.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Elatusturvalaki 26 § 2 kohta; Elatusturvalaki 27 §: The court may not grant a release application to recover erroneously paid support if the amount has already been deducted from future payments before the application is filed.

Keywords

AI generated
child support recovery erroneous payment deduction release application admissibility municipal support board administrative court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Elatusturvalaki 26 § 2 kohta
Elatusturvalaki 27 §
AI generated
admin_1996_northern-karelia-county__362
Social support paid by mistake to a full-age brother is not recoverable under child support law.
admin_1989_turku-and-pori-county__681
Social board's error in awarding child support instead of compensation was not grounds for exemption from repayment.
admin_1993_kyme-county__578
County court allows municipality's claim for repayment of wrongly paid housing support due to changed circumstances.
admin_1989_aland-county__65
Appeal dismissed because social support revocation was not yet legally determined by the social committee.
insurance_2019_716-2019
Social security court allows correction of benefit decision without consent when error is not obvious and not caused by applicant's conduct.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Vantaan sosiaalilautakunta oli maksanut elatustukea virheellisesti

ajalta 1.9.1982 - 31.3.1983. Tuen nostaja oli muuttanut

marraskuussa 1983 toiseen kuntaan, jonka sosiaalilautakunta

oli perinyt virheellisesti maksetun elatustuen määrän

pidättämällä sen tuen nostajalle myöhemmin maksetuista elatustuen

eristä ja tilittänyt summan ensin mainitulle sosiaalilautakunnalle

ennen kuin tuen nostajan tekemä vapautushakemus

oli tullut vireille lääninoikeudessa.

Uudenmaan lääninoikeus tutki asian, koska vapautushakemuksen

katsottiin kohdistuvan virheellisesti elatustuen maksaneeseen

sosiaalilautakuntaan, vaikka elatustukiasia muuten olikin jo

siirtynyt toisen läänin alueella sijaitsevan kunnan sosiaalilautakunnalle.

Lääninoikeus hylkäsi hakemuksen, koska virheellisesti

suoritettu tuki oli peritty takaisin jo ennen vapautushakemuksen

vireilletuloa lääninoikeudessa.

ElatusturvaL 26 § 2 kohta

ElatusturvaL 27 §