Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Keski-Suomen LO 7.9.1984 1211 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal; bridge not deemed new construction under Building Act requiring planning permission.

Case Number Keski-Suomen LO 7.9.1984 1211
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Finland (FI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the County Administrative Board's refusal to grant a building permit for a bridge. The Board determined the structure was not a new construction or a building under the Building Act, thus no permit was required. The court upheld this decision, finding the bridge did not fall within the statutory definitions necessitating planning approval.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Rakennuslaki 7 ja 9 luku; Rakennusasetus 121 ja 137 luku: A structure not meeting the legal definition of a new building or building under the Building Act does not require a building permit.

Keywords

AI generated
building permit requirement new construction definition administrative court appeal building act provisions planning permission denial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Rakennuslaki 7 luku
Rakennuslaki 9 luku
Rakennuslaki 130 luku
Rakennuslaki 131 luku
Rakennusasetus 121 luku
Rakennusasetus 137 luku

Cited Case Law

AI generated
KHO:n päätös 13.2.1985 taltionumero 557
KHO:n päätös 13.2.1985 taltionumero 557.
AI generated
kho-other_2015_272
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal against municipal council's final decision on centralized social and health service restructuring.
admin_2003_vaasa__261
Environmental permit dismissed for insufficient pre-approval structural capacity assessments violating environmental protection caution principle.
admin_2012_hameenlinna__516
Administrative court dismissed appeal against planning committee condition requiring residence building to be built after stables and barns.
kho-precedent_2007_66
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal due to lack of standing under Building Act 190 § 3. Appeal rejected without review as no leave to appeal granted.
kho-precedent_2010_48
Supreme Court dismissed permit for artificial groundwater recharge basins, ruling they are not construction projects requiring building permits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sorvaamorakennuksen päätyyn rakennettavaa neljä metriä korkeaa, seitsemän metriä leveää ja 10 metriä pitkää siltanosturia tukirakennelmineen ei pidetty uudisrakennuksena eikä RakA 121 §:ssä tarkoitettuna rakennelmana. Sen rakentamiseen ei siten tarvittu rakennuslupaa eikä rakennuslautakunnan lupaa. Rakennuslautakunnan ei tarvinnut tässä yhteydessä selvittää tarvittiinko nosturin rakentamiseen mahdollisesti terveydenhoitolain 26 §:ssä tarkoitettu lupa.

RakennusL 7 §

RakennusL 9 §

RakennusL 130 §

RakennusL 131 §

RakennusA 121 §

RakennusA 137 §

KHO:n päätös 13.2.1985 taltionumero 557. Ei muutosta.