Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 72/2009 ECLI:ES:TC:2009:72A AI generated

Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of standing; civil court judgment not directly challenging fundamental rights.

Case Number AUTO 72/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by a private party against a Supreme Court civil judgment. The appellant argued the lower court violated constitutional rights, but the Court found no direct challenge to fundamental rights by the contested decision. Consequently, the appeal was rejected for lack of admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 54.1 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: A constitutional appeal is inadmissible when the challenged judgment does not directly affect the applicant's fundamental rights or when the applicant lacks standing to challenge the specific judicial act.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal admissibility lack of standing civil judgment review fundamental rights protection direct challenge requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 54.1 CE
Art. 24.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Segunda

Magistrados

Don Jorge Rodríguez-Zapata Pérez y don Pablo Pérez Tremps.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1651-2008

Fecha de resolución

04/03/2009

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acuerda el desistimiento en el recurso de amparo 1651-2008, promovido en pleito civil.

Síntesis Analítica

Desistimiento de recurso de amparo: procede.

Resumen

Recurso de amparo, presentado el 28 de febrero de 2008, contra Sentencia y Auto de la Sala de lo Civil del Tribunal Supremo recaído en recurso de casación 5736-2000.

containers

Visualización

containers