Constitutional appeal dismissed due to withdrawal; no constitutional violation found in Supreme Court's procedural ruling.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal for amparo filed by the applicant against a Supreme Court order denying a retrial request. The applicant argued that the Supreme Court's decision violated constitutional rights, but the court noted the appeal had been withdrawn before a final ruling. Consequently, the court ruled that no constitutional violation required adjudication since the applicant no longer pursued the remedy.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: When a constitutional appeal is withdrawn, the court does not need to examine whether a violation of constitutional rights occurred, as the applicant has voluntarily abandoned the remedy.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don Tomás Salvador Vives Antón, don Vicente Conde Martín de Hijas y don Eugeni Gay Montalvo.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 7389-2003
Fecha de resolución
19/04/2004
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acuerda el desistimiento en el recurso de amparo 7389-2003, promovido en causa penal.
Síntesis Analítica
Desistimiento de recurso de amparo: procede.
Resumen
Recurso de amparo, presentado el 9 de diciembre de 2003, contra el Auto de la Sala Segunda del Tribunal Supremo dictada en el recurso de revisión 95/2003, en el que se acuerda no haber lugar a interponer recurso de revisión contra la Sentencia del Juzgado de lo Penal núm. 16 de Madrid.
containers
Visualización
containers