Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 94/2002 ECLI:ES:TC:2002:94A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for desistance due to lack of procedural standing and failure to exhaust remedies.

Case Number AUTO 94/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal for desistance filed by the applicant. The applicant argued that the desistance was invalid because they had not properly exhausted administrative remedies prior to filing. The court ruled that the desistance was procedurally inadmissible as it lacked the necessary legal foundation and did not comply with the required exhaustion of remedies.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 44.1 CE: The desistance of an appeal for desistance is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate the exhaustion of administrative remedies or lacks the requisite procedural standing to file the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal for desistance exhaustion of remedies procedural standing constitutional appeal procedural inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 44.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Pablo Cachón Villar, don Guillermo Jiménez Sánchez y doña Elisa Pérez Vera.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 4830-2001

Fecha de resolución

03/06/2002

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acuerda el desistimiento en el recurso de amparo 4830-2001.

Síntesis Analítica

Desistimiento de recurso de amparo: procede.

containers

Visualización

containers