Legislator Case Law & Legislation
AUTO 85/2002 ECLI:ES:TC:2002:85A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for desistance due to lack of procedural standing and failure to meet admissibility requirements.

Case Number AUTO 85/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal for desistance filed by the applicant. The applicant argued that the desistance was invalid because the underlying administrative act remained in force, but the Court found no procedural basis to overturn the desistance itself. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible due to the absence of a valid legal interest to contest the desistance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 24.2 CE: The right to effective judicial protection does not extend to challenging a desistance from an appeal for protection when the desistance is procedurally valid and the applicant lacks a continuing legal interest to contest it.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal for desistance procedural standing legal interest admissibility requirements effective judicial protection constitutional appeal procedural validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 24.2 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Pablo Cachón Villar, don Guillermo Jiménez Sánchez y doña Elisa Pérez Vera.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 4924-2001

Fecha de resolución

20/05/2002

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acuerda el desistimiento en el recurso de amparo 4924-2001.

Síntesis Analítica

Desistimiento de recurso de amparo: procede.

containers

Visualización

containers