Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against civil court judgment due to lack of constitutional complaint admissibility.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal against a civil judgment because the underlying dispute did not meet the strict admissibility requirements for a constitutional complaint. The applicant sought relief against a first-instance ruling in a civil cognizance proceeding, but the Court found no violation of fundamental rights justifying constitutional review. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as the matter fell outside the scope of constitutional protection.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.2 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: A constitutional complaint is inadmissible when the dispute arises from ordinary civil proceedings and does not involve a direct violation of constitutional rights by public authorities.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Cuarta
Magistrados
Don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende, don Tomás Salvador Vives Antón y don Guillermo Jiménez Sánchez.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 92-1999
Fecha de resolución
10/11/1999
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acuerda el desistimiento en el recurso de amparo 92/1999, promovido en pleito civil.
Síntesis Analítica
Desistimiento de recurso de amparo: procede.
Resumen
Recurso de amparo contra el Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Murcia que desestima recurso de apelación contra el dictado por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 2 de Cartagena en autos de juicio de cognición 206196.
containers
Visualización
containers