Constitutional Court dismisses appeal regarding presumption of innocence due to lack of judicial activity.
Spain (ES)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Humberto Tinoco Janeiro against a disciplinary separation of the Guardia Civil. The applicant argued that the Supreme Court's proceedings violated his right to the presumption of innocence by failing to conduct necessary investigative activities. The Court rejected this claim, ruling that the absence of specific judicial acts did not constitute a violation of constitutional rights in this context.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 CE; Art. 24.2 CE: The right to a court and the presumption of innocence are not violated by the mere absence of specific judicial investigative acts when no procedural defect is demonstrated.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Pedro Cruz Villalón, don Pablo García Manzano y don Fernando Garrido Falla.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1613-1998
Fecha de resolución
22/03/1999
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.613/1998.
Resumen
Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria.
Don Humberto Tinoco Janeiro contra Sentencia de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo en recurso contencioso disciplinario contra resolución del Ministerio de Defensa sobre sanción de separación del servicio de la Guardia Civil.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1999/1999_00064-1998_01613.pdf