Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of content in the demand regarding the right to presumption of innocence.
Spain (ES)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Humberto Tinoco Janeiro against disciplinary sanctions imposed on a Guardia Civil officer. The applicant argued that the Supreme Court's proceedings violated his constitutional right to the presumption of innocence, but the Court found the demand lacked necessary content to substantiate this claim. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the applicant failed to demonstrate how the specific procedural activity infringed upon his fundamental rights.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: The right to a court and the presumption of innocence require a demand with sufficient content; an appeal lacking this substantive basis is inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Pedro Cruz Villalón, don Pablo García Manzano y don Fernando Garrido Falla.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1611-1998
Fecha de resolución
22/03/1999
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.611/1998
Resumen
Inadmisión. Derecho a la presunción de inocencia: actividad probatoria. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.
Don Humberto Tinoco Janeiro contra Sentencia de la Sala Quinta del Tribunal Supremo en recurso contencioso disciplinario contra resoluciones del Ministerio de Defensa sobre sanción de separación del servicio de la Guardia Civil.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1999/1999_00063-1998_01611.pdf