Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to disappearance of object in execution proceedings against a judgment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the underlying object of the protection had disappeared. The applicant, Francisco Javier González López, challenged execution judgments from the First Instance Court in Madrid, but the Court found no viable constitutional issue to address. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as it lacked a substantive legal basis for review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 24.1 CE: When the object of a constitutional appeal disappears due to the finality of execution proceedings, the appeal is inadmissible as there is no longer a protected right to review.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sala Primera
Magistrados
Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don Pedro Cruz Villalón, don Enrique Ruiz Vadillo, don Manuel Jiménez de Parga y Cabrera y don Pablo García Manzano.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 1266-1997
Fecha de resolución
16/03/1998
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.266/1997.
Resumen
Recurso de amparo: desaparición del objeto.
Don Francisco Javier González López contra resoluciones del Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 2 de Madrid, recaídas en juicio ejecutivo.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1998/1998_00073-1997_01266.pdf