Constitutional court dismisses appeal against abbreviated trial opening in theft case due to lack of constitutional violation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal against the opening of an abbreviated oral trial for the crime of misappropriation. The applicant argued that the procedural measure violated constitutional rights, but the court found no substantive constitutional defect in the abbreviated procedure. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without a full doctrinal analysis.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 113 CE: The Constitutional Court holds that the opening of an abbreviated trial does not constitute a violation of the right to a fair trial or legal certainty when the statutory requirements are met.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 2437-1997
Fecha de resolución
29/09/1997
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acuerda el desistimiento en el recurso de amparo 2.437/1997, en causa penal.
Síntesis Analítica
Desistimiento de recurso de amparo.
Resumen
Recurso de amparo contra el Auto del Juzgado de Instrucción de Haro que acuerda la apertura del juicio oral en procedimiento abreviado incoado en virtud de supuesto delito de apropiación indebida.
containers
Visualización
containers