Constitutional Court clarifies that preventive detention in one case does not preclude its payment in another.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court issued an auto clarifying a previous ruling regarding a claim by Mr. Solís for the payment of preventive detention incurred in a separate criminal proceeding. The applicant argued that the denial of payment in the current case violated his rights, while the opposing party contended the debt was specific to the original cause. The court decided that the constitutional principle of equality and the nature of preventive detention as a coercive measure require its payment regardless of the specific case context.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.: The right to compensation for preventive detention is not limited to the specific criminal proceeding where the detention was ordered, and its payment must be ensured in other related cases to guarantee legal certainty and equality.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Primera
Magistrados
Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don Pedro Cruz Villalón y don Enrique Ruiz Vadillo.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 3692-1996
Fecha de resolución
21/02/1997
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Aclarando ATC 44/1997 recaído en el en el recurso de amparo 3.692/1996.
Resumen
Auto de aclaración del ATC 44/1997.
Don Sebastián Jerónimo Solís contra denegación por parte del Juzgado de lo Penal núm. 22 de Barcelona del abono de prisión preventiva sufrida en otra causa.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1997/1997_00046-1996_03692.pdf