Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 356/1996 ECLI:ES:TC:1996:356A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to formally invoke the right claimed in the demand.

Case Number AUTO 356/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don José Pereñíguez Celdrán against a social court ruling dismissing his claim against the Ministry of Defense. The applicant argued a constitutional violation regarding the amount awarded, but the Court found a formal defect in how the right was invoked within the demand itself. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the procedural requirement to explicitly identify the violated right was not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 44.1 CE: The Constitutional Court must declare an appeal inadmissible if the applicant fails to formally invoke the specific right claimed to be violated in the initial demand.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation of rights procedural defect in demand inadmissibility of appeal constitutional protection of rights social court proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 44.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1453-1996

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1996

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.453/1996.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José Pereñíguez Celdrán contra Auto del Juzgado de lo Social núm. 2 de Murcia que confirma providencia anterior que ordenó el archivo de la demanda contra el Ministerio de Defensa, sobre cantidad.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1996/1996_00356-1996_01453.pdf