Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 355/1996 ECLI:ES:TC:1996:355A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to failure to formally invoke the right claimed in the petition.

Case Number AUTO 355/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible because the petitioner failed to formally invoke the specific right they claimed was violated. The applicant, representing a dispute over military pay, did not explicitly identify the constitutional provision infringed upon in the initial petition. Consequently, the court ruled that without this formal invocation, the substantive constitutional content of the demand could not be examined.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 44.1 CE: The Constitutional Court must reject an appeal if the petitioner fails to formally invoke the specific right alleged to be violated, as this requirement is a prerequisite for admissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
formal invocation requirement constitutional appeal admissibility failure to specify right procedural defect in petition constitutional content of demand

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 44.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 1451-1996

Fecha de resolución

09/12/1996

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 1.451/1996.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Invocación formal del derecho vulnerado: falta. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Francisco Caravaca Cuenca contra Auto del Juzgado de lo Social núm. 2 de Murcia que confirma providencia anterior que ordenó el archivo de la demanda contra el Ministerio de Defensa, sobre cantidad.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1996/1996_00355-1996_01451.pdf