Constitutional Court dismisses unconstitutionality challenge due to lack of specific legal interest and procedural standing.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the unconstitutionality challenge 1609/1996 filed by a private citizen. The petitioner argued that a specific administrative act violated constitutional rights without providing sufficient legal grounds. The Court rejected the claim because the applicant failed to demonstrate a direct and specific legal interest in the outcome of the proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 62.1 CE; Art. 160 CE: A unconstitutionality challenge is inadmissible if the petitioner lacks a specific legal interest or standing to initiate the procedure.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Pleno
Magistrados
Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra, don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende, don Julio D. González Campos, don Pedro Cruz Villalón, don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer, don Enrique Ruiz Vadillo, don Manuel Jiménez de Parga y Cabrera, don Javier Delgado Barrio y don Tomás Salvador Vives Antón.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Cuestión de inconstitucionalidad 1609-1996
Fecha de resolución
18/07/1996
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la inadmisión a trámite de la cuestión de inconstitucionalidad 1.609/1996.
Resumen
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1996/1996_00216-1996_01609.pdf