Constitutional Court dismisses multiple unconstitutionality questions regarding the 1995 Organic Law on the Judiciary.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed a series of unconstitutionality questions accumulated under a single registration number. The applicants challenged specific provisions of the Organic Law on the Judiciary, arguing they violated constitutional principles. The Court rejected these claims, upholding the law's validity without incorporating new constitutional doctrine.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 93.1 CE; Art. 149.1.13 CE: The Constitutional Court declares unconstitutionality questions inadmissible when the challenged laws do not violate constitutional norms or when the questions lack admissibility requirements.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Pleno
Magistrados
Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don José Vicente Gimeno Sendra, don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende, don Julio D. González Campos, don Pedro Cruz Villalón, don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer, don Enrique Ruiz Vadillo, don Manuel Jiménez de Parga y Cabrera, don Javier Delgado Barrio y don Tomás Salvador Vives Antón.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Cuestión de inconstitucionalidad 2043-1996
Fecha de resolución
09/07/1996
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando la acumulación de las cuestiones de inconstitucionalidad 4.299/1995, 4.302/1995, 4.303/1995, 251/1996, 252/1996, 600/1996, 601/1996, 662/1996, 1.148/1996, 1.239/1996, 1.485/1996, 1.532/1996, 1.533/1996 y 2.043/1996 a la registrada con el número 4.298/1995.
Resumen
containers
Visualización
containers