Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to disappearance of the object of the constitutional remedy.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible because the underlying administrative sanction had already been definitively resolved by the Supreme Court. The applicant sought protection against a tax penalty imposed by the Tarragona Treasury Delegation, which was subsequently challenged via cassation. The Court ruled that since the cassation appeal was partially admitted and the original administrative act was no longer in force, the constitutional remedy lost its subject matter.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24.1 CE; Art. 24.2 CE: When the object of the constitutional appeal disappears due to a final judicial resolution, the remedy is inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:
Identificación
Órgano
Sala Segunda
Magistrados
Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende, don Julio D. González Campos, don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer y don Tomás Salvador Vives Antón.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 921-1995
Fecha de resolución
10/06/1996
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acordando el archivo de las actuaciones en el procedimiento 921/1995.
Síntesis Analítica
Recurso de amparo: desaparición del objeto.
Resumen
Don José María Mas Espolet contra Auto de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo que acuerda parcialmente admitido recurso de casación contra Sentencia dictada por el Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña en recurso contra resolución de la Delegación de Hacienda de Tarragona sobre sanción.
containers
Visualización
containers
[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1996/1996_00148-1995_00921.pdf