Constitutional appeal dismissed due to lack of standing in a civil dispute over debt claims.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal filed by a private individual against a Supreme Court ruling denying a cassation request in a civil debt case. The applicant argued that the lower court's decision violated constitutional rights, but the Court found no direct constitutional injury. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the applicant lacked the necessary standing to challenge a civil judgment through this specific constitutional remedy.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 CE; Art. 53.1 CE: A private party may not file a constitutional appeal against a civil court decision unless they demonstrate a direct and specific violation of their constitutional rights, which is absent in disputes over monetary claims where the judgment is merely procedural.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
*Este auto no incorpora doctrina constitucional.*
Identificación
Órgano
Sección Tercera
Magistrados
Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.
Número y fecha BOE
Tipo y número de registro
Recurso de amparo 180-1996
Fecha de resolución
15/04/1996
Síntesis y resumen
Síntesis Descriptiva
Acuerda el desistimiento en el recurso de amparo 180/1996, promovido en pleito civil.
Síntesis Analítica
Desistimiento de recurso de amparo: procede.
Resumen
Recurso de amparo contra el auto de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo, que desestima recurso de queja contra el dictado por la Audiencia Provincial de San Sebastián, denegando recurso de casación contra Sentencia de la propia Audiencia dimanante de autos sobre reclamación de cantidad.
containers
Visualización
containers