Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 96/1996 ECLI:ES:TC:1996:96A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal as it is not a valid channel for reviewing the constitutionality of laws.

Case Number AUTO 96/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the remedy is not intended for the control of norms. The applicant, a doctor, challenged a Supreme Court decision regarding the integration of forensic doctors into a specific corps, arguing violations of equality and access to public office. The Court rejected these claims because the appeal mechanism does not serve as a vehicle for constitutional review of legislative acts.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 43.1 CE: The appeal for protection of rights is not a channel for the control of norms; it is inadmissible when the contested act is a law or a normative act of general application.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal for protection of rights control of norms constitutional review legislative acts procedural inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 43.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende, don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer y don Tomás Salvador Vives Antón.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 3783-1995

Fecha de resolución

15/04/1996

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 3.783/1995.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Recurso de amparo: no es vía para el control de normas. Principio de igualdad: retribución de funcionarios; falta término de comparación. Derecho a acceder a los cargos públicos: provisión de puestos de trabajo. Funcionarios: integración de

cuerpos. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don José María Vila Codina contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo recaída en recurso contra el Real Decreto 181/1993, de 9 de febrero, sobre integración de los Médicos del Registro Civil en el Cuerpo de Médicos Forenses.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1996/1996_00096-1995_03783.pdf