Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 94/1996 ECLI:ES:TC:1996:94A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal as it is not a control of norms route and equality principle fails due to missing comparison term.

Case Number AUTO 94/1996
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the appeal route does not serve for the control of norms. The applicants argued for equal retribution of civil registry doctors compared to forensic doctors, but the court found a lack of a defined comparison term. Consequently, the claim regarding access to public positions was rejected due to this procedural and substantive deficiency.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 14 CE: The appeal route is not a mechanism for controlling norms, and the principle of equality requires a clear comparison term which was absent in this case.

Keywords

AI generated
control of norms principle of equality public officials retribution appeal inadmissibility comparison term deficiency

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 14 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Cuarta

Magistrados

Don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende, don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer y don Tomás Salvador Vives Antón.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 3779-1995

Fecha de resolución

15/04/1996

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 3.779/1995.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Recurso de amparo: no es vía para el control de normas. Principio de igualdad: retribución de funcionarios; falta término de comparación. Derecho a acceder a los cargos públicos: provisión de puestos de trabajo. Funcionarios: integración de

cuerpos. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Inmaculada Almuzara Sauras y otros contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo recaída en recurso contra Real Decreto 181/1993, de 9 de febrero, sobre integración de los Médicos del Registro Civil en el Cuerpo de Médicos Forenses.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1996/1996_00094-1995_03779.pdf