Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 325/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:325A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal against summary foreclosure judgment due to extrajudicial satisfaction of the claim.

Case Number AUTO 325/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal admissible but subsequently dismissed it because the underlying debt was already satisfied extrajudicially. The applicant, Promociones Daimiel S.M.A., challenged a summary foreclosure judgment issued by the First Instance Court of Madrid. The Court ruled that since the creditor's claim had been fully met outside the judicial process, the legal basis for the appeal no longer existed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24.1 CE; Art. 53.1 CE: When a claim is satisfied extrajudicially, the constitutional appeal against the resulting judicial enforcement order is extinguished by satisfaction.

Keywords

AI generated
constitutional appeal summary foreclosure extrajudicial satisfaction extinction of appeal property enforcement civil procedure satisfaction of debt

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24.1 CE
Art. 53.1 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sala Segunda

Magistrados

Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, don Rafael de Mendizábal Allende, don Julio D. González Campos, don Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer y don Tomás Salvador Vives Antón.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 2556-1992

Fecha de resolución

11/12/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando declarar la extinción, por satisfacción extraprocesal, del recurso de amparo 2.556/1992.

Resumen

Desistimiento: procedencia.

«Promociones Daimiel, S.M.A.» contra Auto de la Sección Duodécima de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid recaído en apelación contra el dictado por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 26 de Madrid, en procedimiento judicial sumario del art. l31 de la Ley

Hipotecaria.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00325-1992_02556.pdf