Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 241/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:241A AI generated

Constitutional Court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and failure to compare equal situations.

Case Number AUTO 241/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal Constitucional declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the lower court's dismissal of proceedings violated the effective judicial protection of judges and tribunals. The applicants argued for equality in legal treatment, but the Court found no comparable situation to evaluate. Consequently, the decision was rejected because the constitutional content of the demand was lacking and the resolution was unmotivated.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1995: The right to effective judicial protection requires that resolutions be motivated and that equal situations be compared; a lack of motivation or failure to establish a comparable situation renders the appeal inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection motivation of resolution principle of equality constitutional content of demand inadmissibility of appeal judges and tribunals lack of comparable situation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1995

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 661-1995

Fecha de resolución

11/09/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 661/1995.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: motivación de la resolución recurrida. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Doña Margarita Núñez Palomar y otros contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Segovia recaído en apelación contra el dictado por el Juzgado de Instrucción de Cuéllar que archiva diligencias previas seguidas por presunto delito de imprudencia.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00241-1995_00661.pdf