Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 217/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:217A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to lack of comparison term in equality principle claim.

Case Number AUTO 217/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared inadmissible the appeal filed by Don Jordi Agustí Juliá against a Supreme Court ruling regarding judicial vacancies. The applicant argued for equality in the distribution of specialist social law judges, but the court found no valid comparison term in his claim. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the constitutional principle of equality could not be applied without a proper basis for comparison.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 CE; Art. 24 CE: The principle of equality requires a clear comparison term; without it, the constitutional demand lacks content and cannot be examined.

Keywords

AI generated
Principle of Equality Constitutional Appeal Lack of Comparison Term Judicial Vacancies Inadmissibility Content of Demand Specialist Judges

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 CE
Art. 24 CE

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Tercera

Magistrados

Don José Gabaldón López, don Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral y don Julio D. González Campos.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 541-1995

Fecha de resolución

17/07/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 541/1995.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Principio de igualdad: falta término de comparación. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

Don Jordi Agustí Juliá contra Sentencia de la Sala Tercera del Tribunal Supremo, recaída en recurso contra acuerdo del Pleno del Consejo General del Poder Judicial, sobre plazas de Magistrados especialistas de lo Social.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00217-1995_00541.pdf