Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
AUTO 193/1995 ECLI:ES:TC:1995:193A AI generated

Constitutional court dismisses appeal due to lack of effective judicial protection and irrelevant procedural irregularities.

Case Number AUTO 193/1995
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Spain (ES)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Constitutional Court declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling that the procedural irregularities were irrelevant to the outcome. The applicant argued for effective judicial protection regarding court fees, but the court found the underlying demand lacked constitutional content. Consequently, the court held that the lack of effective judicial protection was not substantiated by the facts presented.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 CE; Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1994: Procedural irregularities that do not affect the essence of the trial or the result do not constitute a violation of the right to effective judicial protection.

Keywords

AI generated
effective judicial protection procedural irregularities constitutional content of claim court fees inadmissible appeal judicial protection relevant facts

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 CE
Art. 1.1 Ley 29/1994

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Esta resolución es accesible en formato PDF:

Identificación

Órgano

Sección Primera

Magistrados

Don Álvaro Rodríguez Bereijo, don Pedro Cruz Villalón y don Enrique Ruiz Vadillo.

Número y fecha BOE

Tipo y número de registro

Recurso de amparo 3552-1994

Fecha de resolución

03/07/1995

Síntesis y resumen

Síntesis Descriptiva

Acordando la inadmisión a trámite del recurso de amparo 3.552/1994.

Resumen

Inadmisión. Tutela efectiva de Jueces y Tribunales: irregularidades procesales irrelevantes. Contenido constitucional de la demanda: carencia.

«Cubiertas y M.Z.O.V.» contra Auto de la Audiencia Provincial de Albacete que confirma el dictado por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia núm. 2 de Albacete, sobre honorarios por informe pericial en autos de menor cuantía.

containers

Visualización

containers

[PDF] https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/HJ/PDF/1995/1995_00193-1994_03552.pdf